Josiah Evans, 1867-24/10/1893.

THE HOURS OF MILLERS.

TO THE EDITOR.

Sir — I see in today's issue a letter from Josiah Evans, head miller Crown Roller Mills, Dunedin, criticising some remarks made by your correspondent, "Once a Miller" re the long hours millers have to work, and calling the remarks misstatements. Will you permit me to inform the head miller Crown Roller Mills that "Once a Miller's" statements are perfectly correct. I have been working in four mills four times the number of years Mr Evans has and have worked 17 hours on a stretch many times, and I know a good many millers in this colony who nave done likewise from 6 am. on Saturday until 11 p.m. Mr Evans' statement that the master millers sympathise with their men in the long hours they have to work, and that they would gladly see them shortened, is simply "bunkum" — they do nothing of the sort.

About two years ago, when the operative millers, "through their union," petitioned the master millers to get their hours of labour shortened, I was present at some of the meetings, held to consider their request, and with the exception of one or two they were all against it, some of them (like our M.H.R.'s in Parliament) voted for the request when they saw it was not likely to be carried, and the whole thing ended in a fizzle. My opinion is that until flour mills are included in the Factory Act millers' hours of labour will never be shortened, and the sooner this is done the better. Perhaps some of our M.H.R's. will see to this next session. — I am &c.  Jno. C Gow, Palmerston, November 5.   -Otago Daily Times, 8/11/1892.

BIRTH.

Evans — On the 19th October, at Laurel Villa, Upper Walker street, the wife of Mr Josiah Evans, of a daughter.  -Otago Daily Times, 21/10/1893.

SAD ACCIDENT.

An accident, which has unfortunately had a fatal termination, occurred about past ten this morning to Josiah Evans, the foreman miller in Messrs R. Anderson and Co's flour mill in Manor place. He was working, with two apprentices named Arthur and Barton, at the purifying machine, to which some repairs were being made, and while proceeding from one side of it to adjust a rod at the other end his leg caught in a belt which was lying loose on a shaft running at a great speed, the belt was set in motion by catching on a pin attached to the side of the pulley, and he was lifted on the belt a distance of about 10ft from the floor, and revolved on the shaft at a furious rate several times until the strain on the belt, which was a comparatively light one, broke it, and Evans was thrown to the floor in an insensible condition. On being lifted in the belt for the first time his head struck against the top of a doorway, and the blow he then received was quite sufficient to stun him; in fact, so great was the velocity with which he was lifted that Arthur, who went to his assistance as soon as the belt caught him, was struck by Evans's body in its ascent and knocked backwards about six yards against some bags of flour. The machinery was stopped immediately on the word being given by Arthur and Barton, but the unfortunate affair occurred so quickly that by the time the engine was at a standstill Evans had been thrown clear off the shaft. First aid was given by Mr Mearns, of the Railway Service. Dr Hocken was quickly in attendance, and Evans was afterwards removed to the hospital in the ambulance waggon. He has been in the mill for a number of years, and has a wife and child (five days old) residing in Upper Walker street. Arthur received a nasty cut on the arm and a bruise on the face.

On being admitted to the hospital Evans was examined by Dr Gordon Macdonald, who found that the poor fellow had sustained fractures of both fore-arms and of the right leg, in addition to four or five very severe scalp wounds. He was then in a state of complete collapse, and at half-past one within two hours after his admission to the institution, he died.

We understand that the deceased had his life insured with the New Zealand Accident Insurance Company for £300. An inquest on the body will be held before Mr Coroner Carew at the hospital at a quarter-past nine to-morrow morning.  -Evening Star, 24/10/1893.

THE FLOUR MILL FATALITY.

The inquest on the body of Josiah Evans was hold at the hospital this morning before Mr Carew, coroner. Mr G. Border, jun., was elected foreman. Sergeant Mulville represented the police. 

James Collins, engineer, identified the body as that of his son-in-law, Josiah Evans, who was born in Manchester, had been in the colony about six years, and was twenty-six years of age. 

George Arthur, miller’s apprentice, employed by R. Anderson and Co., said that Barton, witness, and Evans were working together yesterday morning on the purifier flat. They were taking a shaft out of a purifier for the purpose of repairing it. The mill was going, but the machine they were working at was disconnected. The machinery on the two floors above was at work, driven by belts from shafts on the purifier flat. When witness got to the purifier at which Evans and Barton were working the belt of that machine was disconnected and hanging from the shaft to the floor. Saw Evans come from the left-hand side of the purifier to where the belt was hanging. Saw his foot go on to the belt, which was stationary, and then saw him rise from the floor. Did not know how the belt got caught. Witness made to catch hold of the belt as it was taking him up, and felt himself struck on the head and arm. Picked himself up on the store floor, five or six yards away from the machinery. Got up and went down to the engine. Found Barton was there before him, opening the furnace doors. The mill was just then stopped. Went upstairs and found Evans in Walsh’s arms. Came downstairs to see if anyone was going for a doctor. Evans appeared to be unconscious. The pulley was fixed to the shaft by a pin or key. Had never properly examined the key. Was not sure whether or not the key was far enough into the pulley. The belt had caught upon the key on one previous occasion. Assumed that the belt was caught in the same way yesterday. There was no possible way of stopping the shaft but by stopping the engine. The shaft was driven by a very large belt. Did not think the shaft could be stopped, after giving the engineer notice, till it had made one or two revolutions. There were bells for signalling.

To the jury: The head or exposed part of the pin referred to was not far short of half an inch. When the machine was disconnected the shaft kept on running. There were no sliding pulleys on the shaft. No one signalled to stop the engine. If anyone had signalled, more than likely the engine-driver would not have been in sight, and thus there would have been more delay than by running to the engine, as was done. The engine man had to look after his fires, and sometimes he unloaded his coal — he had these other duties to occasionally take him a short distance away. Did not think that Evans was careless, but if witness himself had been going between the belt and the purifier he would have pushed the belt a little further away from the pulley, and avoided treading on the belt.

To Mr Ryley: The way the belt was thrown off the pulley was the usual way. Did not think it would be possible to have sliding pulleys for the machines — there would be no room for them; and if there had been a sliding pulley it would not, witness thought, have made any difference. If Evans had pushed the belt a little to one side there would have been no danger. 

Dr Hocken said that on being called yesterday morning he found deceased on the third storey of the mill with most severe injuries. He was being attended to by Mr Mearns, and witness would like to testify to the excellent and careful way in which that gentleman was rendering first aid. Witness had no doubt when he saw Evans that death would follow. Deceased was absolutely insensible. His right thigh was broken, and witness thought his left leg also, and there were severe injuries to the head. This injury to the head was no doubt the most serious. Did not minutely examine him, as it would have been useless, and would only have delayed his removal to the hospital. Ordered him a little brandy and water, and he was then taken away in the ambulance vehicle. Did not see Evans after admission to the hospital. Thought the skull must have been fractured. The injuries were sufficient to cause death. 

Iselin Barton, apprentice at the mill, said that Evans was drawn round the shaft two or three times before the belt broke. Witness rushed to the engine, and found the driver there. The mill was stopped in about threequarters of a minute. As soon as Evans had been looked after witness went back, and found that about 18in had been broken out of the belt. The belt had caught in the key, between the key and the shaft. Evans in touching it had probably caused it to catch. The key stuck out about three-quarters of an inch, and it was square. The belt caught on this key once before, about a year ago. The key was in as far as it would go: it had not worked out. 

To the jury: Evans himself took the belt off after it caught on the previous occasion. The pulley did not fit the shaft originally, and a piece of metal was put inside of the bush. That lifted the key from the shaft. It was a laced belt. On the previous occasion of the belt catching it was witness who touched it. 

To Mr Ryley: It was not usual to tie up the belt when out of gear. The dynamo belt was tied up, but that was to allow the floor to be cleaned. When Evans cleared the belt on the previous occasion witness thought that the pulley stopped when the key was over the shaft out of his sight. It sometimes happened that a belt wound round a shaft when there was no key to catch it. If the precaution had been taken of tying up the slack there would have been no danger. 

Mr Ryley said, in answer to the coroner, that he had no evidence to volunteer, but he was prepared to answer any questions. 

One of the jurymen (Mr Heath) intimated that he wished to put a question, and John Ryley, being sworn, said that he carried on the business of R. Anderson and Co. The mill had been inspected by the Government inspector, but witness could not say when; he left that to Evans, who had sole control of the mill and machinery.

Mr Heath intimated that that was what he had wanted to know — whether there had been proper inspection. 

Witness further said that he had had a good deal of experience with machinery, and (word/s missing) how this accident had happened. 

Mr Heath: Do you think that Evans was in any way to blame? 

Witness: I would not say he was to blame. He was a remarkably fine man. I had every confidence in him, and left him sole charge. It was always my instructions that anything that would contribute to the efficiency or the safety of the mill he was to see it was done. I believe there are keys all over the mill. Engineers often leave a bit of a key projecting in order that if a pulley gets slack it may be tightened. Evans would have seen this one and would think it was not dangerous. In my opinion the cause of the accident was the not lifting the slack of the belt off the floor where they were working. This was frequently done. 

To the foreman: The engineer would not have to go away to such a distance as would put him out of sound of the signalling bell. The truck which he had to empty was brought close beside the furnace. The bell was in working order when the accident happened. 

The verdict was to the effect that the death was accidentally caused, and that no blame was attributable to anyone.  -Evening Star, 25/10/1893.

FUNERAL NOTICE. 

THE Friends of the late Josiah Evans are respectfully invited to attend his Funeral, which will leave his late residence, Walker street (near Melville street), for the Northern Cemetery, TO-MORROW (Thursday), the 26th inst., at 2.30 p.m. 

A. J. WYNN AND HOPE, Undertakers, St. Andrew street. 

M.U.I.O.O.F. 

MEMBERS of the are respectfully invited to attend the Funeral of the late Brother Josiah Evans, of the Hand and Heart Lodge, which will leave his late residence, Walker street (Stafford avenue), TO-MORROW (Thursday), at 2.30 p.m., for the Northern Cemetery. 

G. R. WEST, N.G.   -Evening Star, 25/10/1893.

Northern Cemetery, Dunedin.

“A sudden change in a moment fell

no time to bid his friends farewell

think this not strange death happens unto all

today was mine tomorrow you may fall”.

Eva Maude Eason, 1885-26/6/1906.

 RAILWAY FATALITY. 

YOUNG WOMAN KILLED AT CHRISTCHURCH RAILWAY STATION. 

A fatal accident occurred at the Christchurch Railway Station on Saturday afternoon, as the four o'clock train was leaving the platform for Lyttelton. 

A Miss Eva Maude Eason, aged between twenty-one and twenty-two, who intended to travel by train to Lyttelton to return to her employer, Mrs Gardiner, at Purau, hastened down the steps from the footbridge at Madras Street, and as the train moved off attempted to board it. She caught hold of the iron stanchion of the carriage, but swung round, and, losing her foothold, fell between the carriage and the platform. She was dragged for some distance before the train was pulled up, and sustained severe internal injuries. She was conveyed to the Hospital by Constable Saunders, but died about three minutes after admission without regaining consciousness. 

Dr Thomas attended her at the railway station, and found that no bones had been broken, but that she was badly crushed and bruised, and had sustained concussion of the brain. 

Miss Eason was in company with her married sister at the time of the accident. An inquest was held yesterday afternoon at the Hospital, before Mr H. A. Bishop, Coroner. Mr Gray appeared for the Railway Department. 

Mrs Edith J. Anderson, sister of Miss Eason, said that deceased had been living at Purau, and had been in Christchurch visiting her since 10 a.m. on Saturday. The train by which she intended to go to Port started just as they got to the Madras Street railway bridge. The deceased ran on, as it was important that she should catch that train in order to connect with the Purau boat. When boarding the train she slipped between the platform and the carriage. There was nobody at hand to prevent her from boarding the train at the time. She was carrying several small parcels.

Charles W. Smith, engine-driver, said that on Saturday as the 4 p.m. Lyttelton train was leaving Christchurch he was on an engine on the main line almost opposite the Lyttelton engine. When the train had travelled about a couple of car lengths he saw Miss Eason, who appeared to have come from the Madras Street steps, attempting to board it. The train was moving very slowly. She had several parcels with her, and caught hold of the iron upright on the foremost end of the first carriage, but slewed round., and losing her footing fell between the carriage and the platform, where she was crushed until the carriage passed her, when she fell between it and the van. Witness ran forward with the intention of pulling her clear of the wheels, but as he caught hold of her the Westinghouse brakes were applied from the front van, and the train was stopped before it had passed over her. He lifted her, and although there were no marks visible she was unconscious. There was nobody at hand to prevent her from attempting to board, as all the officials stood clear as soon as the train started. The parcels might have encumbered her, although a man could easily have boarded the train at the rate it was going. 

Dr J. T. W. Wilkin, assistant house surgeon at the Hospital, said Miss Eason was brought to the institution on Saturday shortly before five o’clock. She was then in a moribund condition, and in a state of absolute collapse. She was examined, and was found to have a bruise and a slight cut on the back of her head. She was also cut on the thigh and one of the lower left ribs was broken. The lower part of her spine was injured, and she was bruised on the legs. The injuries were consistent with the nature of the accident, and death had resulted from the injuries. 

A verdict was returned that deceased met her death by accidentally falling between the platform and the carriage while attempting to board a moving train.  -Lyttelton Times, 25/6/1906.

Northern Cemetery, Dunedin.

Hyman Julius Isaacs, 1878-10/11/1954.

Hyman Isaacs was born in Dunedin and opened his wholesale agency in Moray Place early in the 1900s.  He also taught dancing and organised dances in Dunedin.  It was important to learn how to dance back then.  For young men, it was one of the few ways to get close to young women.

WANTED Known —

Basket Social, Friday, 25th, Albany street Hall; double, 2s 6d; ladies invited. Dance as usual Wednesday evening. Learners’ Classes, Drill Hill, Gardens. Tuesdays. 

H. Isaacs, secretary  -Evening Star, 19/8/1905. 

 W A N T E D 

(For Country), ENERGETIC BOOT TRAVELLER, 

Knowledge of Boots not altogether necessary. 

Apply (by letter, with copies of references, and state salary required) 

H. ISAACS, Moray place.   -Otago Daily Times, 5/3/1910.

Hyman Isaacs opened a hall in George street where dances were advertised - and roller skating on Mondays and Thursdays.

When Renshaw Goes to the Races

And the Missus Goes Hopping at Hyman Isaacs

Labor Day was responsible for various kinds of accidents, judged by the papers, and also by the marital amenities "boxed" at the Dunedin Magistrate's Court. Two families — now smashed up — and probably more, will have good reason to remember Labor Day. Mrs. Susan Renshaw, who said she had been "the mother of sixteen," claimed guardianship, maintenance and separation orders from her worse half, Bob Renshaw, on the grounds of cruelty. An amusing feature 

OF THIS MARITAL MIX-UP was the admission by the seasoned "mother of sixteen," that she took to dancing at the end of her days, and used to go hopping at Hyman Isaacs's "jiggery," and occasionally in that more fashionable and better ventilated quarter known as the "Art Gallery." The admission, blandly confessed, regaled the court considerably. 

Magistrate Young occupied the bench. 

Lawyer Irwin represented the husband and Lawyer Scurr the wife. 

Mrs. Renshaw said that she had been thrashed on several occasions by her husband, and her boy had been present several times. She was the mother of sixteen — they had all lived. 

Mr. Scurr: They did not all come to fruition? — That is so. 

Continuing, she said that on Labor Day she went with her children to poetic Portobello. When she returned her husband had not the fire lit. She finished the day's fun at the vaudeville, and got tackled in the back yard when she went home. He smacked her and knocked her down, and tried later on to strike her before a Mrs. Wilson, but she went away. He drank heavily and was a terrible gambler. "He gambles even at night in a house in Maclaggan-street, and, on one occasion, he paid a man to take his job while he went to the races." He was never off the racecourse. She found a revolver and a lot of ammunition under her mattress. 

To Mr. Irwin: His friends and employers drink a lot. His mates all drink. She went to Hyman Isaacs's dances, and still attended the weekly dance at the Art Gallery. 

How did this revolver come into the possession of your husband? — Broached cargo in the first instance. Didn't he tell you he bought it? — Yes. Did he ever attempt to use it? — Yes, by pointing it at me. Did you go down the bay with a man named Evans? — No. Was Evans on the same boat on that occasion? — Yes. Evans takes you to afternoon teas? — He does not; he takes my sister and I am with her. He is a military guard on Quarantine Island. You got your photograph taken with Evans? — Yes. And you met him at dances? — Yes. Where have you been living since you left home? — With a lady. 

The S.M.: What became of your first husband? — 

I DIVORCED HIM. He has been killed with the Australian forces. 

And you were living with defendant before you divorced your husband? — Yes. You did not set that forth in the petition? — No. 

William Watt, step-son of defendant, and complainant's son, said that as long as he remembered, his mother's life with defendant was one of misery. Witness often stepped in between Renshaw and his mother, and received the punches delivered by his stepfather. 

To Mr. Irwin: Whenever he went to the races and lost, he usually returned with a face as long as a fiddle. He threatened to fetch up the artillery and blow 'em up. 

He threatened to use the revolver? — Yes. 

Mr. Irwin said that the whole thing that riled Renshaw on Labor Day was that Mrs. Renshaw went down the bay with the man Evans. Renshaw suspected the man. 

Mr. Scurr: He's a soldier of the King. He's a reject and does guard on Quarantine Island. Mrs. Renshaw got a month in a home for going off the straight line, and, on coming out, Renshaw was good enough to marry her. He realises his responsibilities, but wished to see the children. The Magistrate granted complainant guardianship and maintenance orders, but refused to grant a separation order. Maintenance was fixed at 30s a week.  -NZ Truth, 10/11/1917.

WORKERS, WAKE UP, SAVE MONEY! 

Sandals from 4/6. Child’s Boots 7/6, Boys’ and Girls' Chrome School Boots (plated) 7 to 9 13/6, 10 to 13 14/6, 1 to 3 16/11, 4 to 5 17/6; Men’s 21/; Ladies’ 17/11; Men’s Working Bluchers 12/6; Men’s Split Kip, Plated, Nailed, from 18/6; Ladies’ 15/11; Derby Sewn Shoes 16/11. 

Send 2d stamp for price list. Orders ever £3 mailed free. Our Boots Cheapest. Quality Best. A Trial Solicited. 

H. ISAACS,

City Boot Factory, 165 Hanover St., DUNEDIN   -Grey River Argus, 21/10/1922.

A trial which was definitely unsolicited by Hyman Isaacs took place in early 1923.

ALLEGED ILLEGAL ACT

ISAACS BEFORE THE COURT. 

COMMITTED FOR TRIAL. 

In the Police Court yesterday, before Mr E. W. Bundle, S.M., Hyman Isaacs was charged on remand that on February 13, at Dunedin, with intent to procure the miscarriage of a certain girl he did unlawfully use an instrument. He was also charged that on the same day he conspired with certain persons to commit the crime of procuring abortion. 

The accused was represented by Mr A. C. Hanlon. 

On the application of Sub-inspector Eccles the court was cleared and an order suppressing the name of the principal witness was made. 

The girl involved, aged close on 18 years, and single, gave evidence that she was at present pregnant. She had been in that state for about two months when she was examined by Dr Evans. She knew a certain young man, and she knew the accused. While working at a boot factory in Stafford street she had a communication by telephone with the accused. This was before she was examined. She had made an appointment with Isaacs at his shop that evening. On going to the shop she found Isaacs there alone. She sat down in the office and talked about skates and dances. Then she told him of her state and asked Isaacs what to do. The advice was to take Beecham’s pills. He did not tell her anything else. While they were sitting in the office there was a knock at the door. She thought it was the police, and told Isaacs not to open it. She went into the shop and the accused went with her, she supposed. While in the office she could have been seen by anyone looking through the window and anything else on the couch on which she was sitting could also have been seen. That was the first time she had visited the office, and the first time she had been alone with Isaacs. She did not know why she had made an appointment with him; she supposed it was to ask him what she would do. Apart from her coat none of her clothes had been disarranged. 

Mr Hanlon said he had no questions to ask.

Herbert Victor Dale, described as a machinist in business in the Arcade, said that he had known something about the condition of the previous witness. He had wanted her to go to a doctor to find out, but she would not go. Previous to being interviewed by the police witness had met Isaacs in the Arcade. Witness asked him if he knew anything about the treatment of women, and Isaacs answered in the affirmative. Witness had said that he knew a girl who was perhaps that way, and that if she was he would give something to see her out of trouble. About February 12 he saw the accused at his shop and mentioned the girl's name. He told accused where she worked. Accused said he knew the girl, and that he would have a yarn with her. 

Mr Hanlon: When did you first tell anybody about your interview with Isaacs? — On the 13th I told Detective Lean, who came to me. — Did he tell you that it was a bad thing for you, and that you were liable to be charged? — No. He said that if I gave information it would be all right. — Did he tell you that they wanted to get Isaacs? — Yes. — If you didn’t make a statement, what was going to happen? — I would be worse off. — But if you did make a statement giving Isaacs away, what was going to happen? — I was going to be all right. — What was going to happen to the girl? — She was going to be all right, too. — Where did this take place? — At the detectives’ office. — Mr Hanlon: They took you there, did they, and let you go again? 

To the Sub-inspector; Detective Lean did not mention, when he interviewed witness, anything about what charge would be brought against Isaacs. 

Detective Beer stated that in the company of two others he had gone in consequence of information, to the accused’s boot shop in Hanover street about 7.45 on February 13. No lights were to be seen. He and Detective Lean went round to the back door and found it locked. There was no response to a knock. He then heard a slight muffled noise inside, and called to Isaacs to open the door. There was no response. He then tried all the other doors and windows, but all were locked, with the exception of the office window, which was closed but not secured. He pushed it up but iron bars prevented access. He pulled aside the curtain and saw a white towel spread out on the couch. Witness then went to a back window, through which he could see right through the shop. He watched there for some time and on three occasions the accused came from the back of the shop into the office. On the third occasion he went into the scullery and poured something down the sink. There was a sound as of a basin falling, and witness called, ‘‘Open the door; you've made enough noise.” Accused called out. "What for? There’s nothing doing there.” He opened the door and witness walked in. Accused had his coat off and his sleeves rolled up. The door between the shop and the office was partly open, and the accused called from the office. “It's all right ..... dearie, there’s nothing to be frightened of.” A few minutes later the girl entered. Asked to explain her presence, accused denied that she was there to be aborted. He said that he was fixing her up with a pair of skates to take back to Bluff. Asked what had become of the towel that was on the couch, accused said that there had not been any towel there. At the accused's invitation they searched the place and himself; there were no instruments on him. In the scullery witness found the dregs of Jeyes's fluid in the sink, also a basin and three wires. A syringe and a cloth were also found. When the accused saw the articles he said he did not know they were there; they must have been there a long time. Witness rang for the police matron, and he and the matron took the girl to the police station. The accused was taken to the station later and charged with attempting to abort the girl. Accused had nothing to say to the charge. 

Detective Lean found two catheters, and they were shown to accused, who remarked that his boy had told him about them. Detective Lean, who had accompanied Detective Beer on the visit to the shop, gave corroborative evidence covering the events up to the departure of Detective Beer to the station. While witness was picking up some envelopes, accused remarked, "You won't find any correspondence there; I am not such a fool as to keep a diary like Cooper, of Wellington.” Pursuing the search, witness found two towels. Accused admitted that he had been hiding in the shop. Next morning he made another search and found the instruments produced. 

Matron McSweeney stated that the girl's under-garments were found to be wet when she was taken to the police station. 

After some argument the evidence of Detective Palmer was taken, the question of admissibility being reserved. 

Mr Hanlon submitted that it was unfair to publish evidence of doubtful admissibility, as it might, if not admitted, tend to prejudice the case of the accused when he went to trial. 

Mr Bundle agreed with this view, and ordered that the evidence be not published. This closed the case for the prosecution, and the accused was committed for trial, bail was renewed in the previous amounts.  -Otago Daily Times, 6/3/1923.

-NZ Truth, 17/3/1923.

CHARGES OF MALPRACTICE

THE HYMAN ISAACS CASES. 

ACQUITTED ON ALL CHARGES. 

Hearing of the charges against Hyman Isaacs — one of using an instrument to procure a miscarriage, another of attempting to use the instrument, and a third of conspiring to commit a crime — was concluded yesterday afternoon. 

Dr Evans, whose evidence was taken after the luncheon adjournment, described the condition of the girl Dixon, and gave expert evidence regarding catheters. He added that both Chief-detective Bishop and Detective Palmer were too ill to appear in court, to give evidence. 

Detective Beer, continuing his evidence, said that Isaacs came to the door with his coat off. He asked for a match to light the gas with. Witness lit the gas in the office, and told him he had received information that he was about to abort the girl. He denied this, adding that be was merely fixing her up with a pair of skates for her to take back to the Bluff. Witness described the appearance of the room and certain articles found therein. He laid a charge against accused at the detective office. A few days after his release on bail accused called to see witness, who showed him some catheters which had been found on the premises. Accused said he had heard they had been found, but knew nothing about them. Detective Lean gave corroborative evidence.

Catherine McSweeney (Police Matron) also gave evidence, and the evidence of Detective Palmer given in the lower court was read. This referred to the finding of another woman in a hut with Isaacs on an occasion prior to the occasion forming the present change. 

This closed the case for the Crown, and Mr Hanlon intimated that he would not call any witnesses for the defence. 

The Crown Prosecutor, in addressing the jury, submitted that the evidence which had been put forward would leave the jury with no hesitation in acting. The girl had said that she went to Isaacs merely to obtain advice, and that he told her to take pills. He asked them whether, considering the whole of the evidence, they could give credence to that. An important element in determining that question was the evidence of Detective Palmer (read by the registrar) about a previous similar occurrence. The defence would probably be, suggested learned counsel, that the girl went to Isaacs’s place, for an innocent purpose. That being so, the Crown put the evidence before the court of a case in which a married woman had been found in the place under similar circumstances. 

Mr Hanlon, in his address to the jury, said his learned friend must have been sorely pressed for something to say in support of his case when his address to the jury lasted but a minute and a-half. His friend had probably recognised that there was a shaky case against accused. The Crown had set out to prove three things — that accused used an instrument unlawfully to procure a miscarriage; that he attempted to use it; and that there was a conspiracy between the girl, a man, and him to perform an illegal operation. It had been said that the defence would be that the girl went to Isaacs’s place for an innocent purpose. He would remind the jury that it was the duty of the Crown to prove the purpose for which the girl went there, and, if accused were to be convicted, to prove beyond all reasonable doubt that she was there for a guilty purpose. He submitted that the Crown had not done so. Nor had witnesses been brought forward to swear that any conspiracy was entered into. If the Crown wished for a conviction, it must show some legal evidence, upon which the jury could act. In regard to the charge of using an instrument, learned counsel asked: Where was the evidence which went to show an operation was performed? The person best expected to give evidence on that point was the girl herself. In all these cases the girl concerned was brought forward to give evidence against the man, to show that he was the man who had performed the illegal operation. The girl, however, who was a witness for the Crown, said that no operation had taken place. Even if the man were a professional abortionist, it had to be proved in the present case that he performed an operation. The police said that Isaacs could be heard walking backwards and forwards, and that there had been a noise of something being poured down the sink. When they entered they found a solution of Jeyes’ fluid in the sink. If the fluid had been used on the girl, surely there would have been mention by the doctor or the police matron of its pungent odor about clothes. There was also no evidence to show that any slops had been taken to carry out an operation, and counsel continued to ridicule the production of certain instruments by the Crown, stating that they had brought along every instrument — from the wires used for cleaning the sink to anaemia nozzles —and every rag they could find about the place. That did not prove one thing. He supposed that similar instruments were to be found in many houses. In conclusion, Mr Hanlon said that the Crown had not produced any evidence that would in the slightest degree justify a conviction.

His Honor, in summing up, said it was clear the girl was pregnant at the time of the alleged offence. It was also clear from the evidence of Detective Beer that a good deal more must have been going on than the girl admitted, but that did not justify the jury in coming to the conclusion that there had been an offence. The girl was called as a Crown witness, and if she was not telling the truth the Crown’s case must suffer. Unless the Crown could make out a case proving that the girl was not telling the truth, the jury, despite the strong suspicion that they might have, should not allow their imaginations to decide on what had actually taken place. The conditions were certainly very suspicious; but, even if preparations were being made to operate, it was hardly likely that the operation would be gone on with while the police were at the door knocking for admission. The girl said that nothing was done, and that, when she told Isaacs she was pregnant, he had only advised her to take Beecham's pills. And, apart from suspicion, there was nothing in Detective Beer’s evidence to show otherwise. There was no evidence of Dr Evans and the police matron, but it, apart from adding to the suspicions, did not carry the case for the Crown much further. If a man had the intention to commit a crime, and if he did an act with that intent, he might be convicted under the Act, but the evidence of the intention charge did not seem to be any better than that of the actual commission. The evidence of Detective Poor did not make it any stronger than in the other charge. There was no evidence to justify a conviction. The judge briefly reviewed the evidence on the charge of conspiracy, which, he said, depended on the witness Dale, remarking that it was for the jury to decide. 

The jury retired till 3.55 p.m. and returned after half an hour's absence. 

A verdict of “not guilty" was returned on all counts.   -Evening Star, 12/5/1923.

TRADES HALL DANCE 

The Trades Hall was again well filled last Friday evening at a dance held under the auspices of the National Unemployed Workers' Movement. Mr Hyman Isaacs, as judge of the Destiny competition, selected the following couples to compete in the final: — Miss Gilchrist and Mr Legg, Mr and Mrs. Andrews, Miss Dore and Mr McIndoe, and Miss Wilson and Mr Geddes. The Monte Carlo was won by Miss Thomson and Mr Phillips. The lucky spot by Miss Frew and Mr Bain, and the lucky number was held by Mr McTaggart.   -Otago Daily Times, 27/6/1935.

In 1944 Hyman's City Boot Factory moved from Hanover to st Andrew st and at about that time Hyman retired.  At least, from the boot trade.

SERIOUS CHARGE

ATTEMPTED ABORTION ALLEGED 

DUNEDIN PROSECUTION 

Eleven witnesses were called by the Crown in the Supreme Court yesterday, when Hyman Julius Isaacs, aged 69, a retired bootmaker, pleaded not guilty to a charge that on June 18 he attempted unlawfully to use an instrument with intent to procure a miscarriage. No evidence was called for the defence, and the case will be concluded this morning, when Mr Justice Kennedy sums up and the jury retires. Mr J. B. Deaker appeared for the Crown, and the accused was represented by Mr F. W. Guest, who had with him Mr C. H. Stevens. The public gallery was filled in the afternoon.

“In this case, the Crown says that the accused was apprehended almost in the act,” Mr Deaker declared. “The charge is not one of using an instrument, but attempting to use one. The Crown submits that the accused had gone far beyond the act of preparation when the police entered the room.”

The prosecutor said that the woman concerned, after finding she was pregnant, interviewed the accused on June 17 and asked him to help her. The sum of £l5 was mentioned. The following night she called for the accused in a car driven by another man, and they went to her flat in Russell street. They went into the bedroom, where the accused produced various articles. 

Police Enter House “About 8.15 the same night four detectives took up their positions in Russell street, and about 10 minutes to 9 a man and a woman left the house,” Mr Deaker continued. “Some time after 9 o’clock the car returned, and the woman and the accused entered the house. Two of the detectives entered the front door and heard voices and the tinkle of instruments in a dish. 

“The police waited no longer, and shouldered the door open. In the bedroom they found the accused and the woman, who was on the bed. The accused said: ‘I am just testing for a pregnancy.’ Instruments and other articles were collected by the police, and the woman and the accused were taken to the Police Station, where she was examined by Dr Harty, the police doctor. When the accused was charged, he refused to make a statement." 

Dr E. F. D'Ath, professor of pathology at Otago University, identified several exhibits produced as instruments, and articles which were given to him by Detective Sergeant Brown. Witness said that no instrument was used for testing for pregnancy, but one of the instruments produced had been known to be used for criminal abortions. 

Evidence was given by Dr J. R. H. Fulton and Dr A. S. Moody about the pregnancy of the woman involved in the case. Shown one of the exhibits, Dr Moody said that under no circumstances would he use such an instrument in determining a pregnancy. Dr E. R. Harty said that when he examined the woman in the Police Station on June 18, she was pregnant. 

Giving evidence, the woman concerned in the case, said she was divorced two years and a-half ago and had a child aged 17. 

Photographs taken at the woman's home on June 19 were produced by Constable G. P. Dwan. 

Evidence was given by the man responsible for the woman’s condition and by a woman who lived in the same house in Russell street. 

Detective Sergeant Macdonald Brown said that before the police burst into the bedroom they had not recognised the two people who entered the house. The woman was on the bed and the accused had his sleeves rolled up. He had an instrument in his hand. “For a moment or two he was speechless,” the detective said. 

Corroborative evidence was given by Detective Sergeant R. J. A. Berry and Acting Detective K. G. Jeffries. 

“Society has always regarded such cases as serious, not only as a source of danger to life of the woman concerned, but for other obvious reasons." Mr Deaker said in his closing address to the jury. “I submit that your duty is crystal clear.” 

Case for Defence The Crown had to prove that it had precisely sheeted the charge home, said Mr Guest, for the defence. Acts which raised suspicions were not necessarily attempts, and the jury had to be sure that attempts were accompanied in the mind of the accused by the intention to commit an offence. Counsel said that evidence of an accomplice had to be considered carefully, and if the accused was guilty, then the woman in the case- was equally guilty. 

A point emphasised by Mr Guest was that no evidence had been adduced to show that an instrument was used on the woman. There was also no proof that a payment of £l5 had been made. The time that elapsed between the arrival of the accused and the woman at the flat, and the entry of the detectives into the bedroom was very brief, and counsel submitted that it was just long enough for the accused to commence an examination. 

“There is no evidence that he formed in his mind the intent to commit an abortion on that woman,” Mr Guest concluded, “and if there was no intent there is nothing to justify the charge.”  -Otago Daily Times, 12/7/1948.

VERDICT OF GUILTY

ATTEMPTED ABORTION 

REMANDED FOR SENTENCE 

Hyman Julius Isaacs, a retired bootmaker, aged 69, was found guilty in the Supreme Court yesterday of attempting unlawfully to use an instrument with intent to procure a miscarriage. Isaacs was remanded to appear for sentence at 10 o’clock this morning. 

The jury retired at 10.45 a.m. and gave its verdict at 2.15 p.m. At 12.45 p.m., after an absence of two hours, the jury returned to the courtroom to ask the judge for further definition of the. term “attempt” in relation to “preparation.” At 1 p.m. the jury adjourned for lunch, and gave its verdict when the court resumed at 2.15 p.m. 

Mr Justice Kennedy presided. Mr J. B. Deaker appeared for the Crown, and the prisoner was represented by Mr F. W. Guest, who had with him Mr C. H. Stevens.  -Otago Daily Times, 22/7/1948.

SENT TO PRISON

EIGHTEEN MONTHS’ HARD LABOUR 

ATTEMPTED ABORTION CHARGE 

In the Supreme Court yesterday, Hyman Julius Isaacs, aged 69, was sentenced to 18 months’ imprisonment with hard labour. The previous day, Isaacs had been found guilty of attempting unlawfully to use an instrument with intent to procure a miscarriage. 

“Nothing can be said in mitigation of this class of offence,” said Mr F. W. Guest, appearing for the prisoner. “I can only draw your Honor’s attention to the age of the prisoner. He is now in his 70th year. His wife is alive and he has a grown-up family. 

“This offence is a serious one and, according to the evidence, I cannot disregard the fact that for this crime you were available on application." Mr Justice Kennedy said in passing sentence. “Criminal acts such as you have committed may gravely affect physical health and may certainly impair moral health.”   -Otago Daily Times, 23/7/1948.

Andersons Bay Cemetery, Dunedin. DCC photo.

Robert Campbell, 1843-9/12/1889.

 

A NEW ZEALAND HOMESTEAD.

On Thursday last, the foundation-stone was laid for a new residence for the Honourable Robert Campbell, at his fine estate of Otekaike, in the Waitaki district. There was a large gathering of all the workmen and others on the estate.

Mr A C. Begg, agent for the Honourable R. Campbell, in the course of some remarks, said that, about 20 years ago, Mr J. P. Taylor, late Superintendent of Southland, had penetrated up the Waitaki Valley as far as Otekaike, and had then taken up the country around them. His dwelling-house was a very primitive one, being a cave in the limestone rock, covered over with a tent-fly, and situated about 100 yards from where they then stood. Some of the pegs and a portion of the calico used could still be seen on the face of the rock. Some years afterwards, Mr W. H. Dansey, who then owned the run, had erected the house which had just been pulled down (after having stood for 18 years) to make room for the new one. The old house when erected was, without exception, the finest in Otago. Now, however, it had been pulled down to make room for a much finer building, the foundation stone of which they were about to lay, and which would be one of the very best country houses in New Zealand. Mr Campbell intended making this his home, and it was to be hoped that many of the large landowners in Otago would follow his example, and make their homes on their estates. He called on. those present to drink to the successful completion of the building, and to the health of Mr and Mrs Campbell.

Mr Kruger, one of the contractors, having replied in suitable terms, and Mr and Mrs Campbell's health having been drunk with applause, species of the various coins of the realm, and also the Dunedin and Oamaru newspapers of latest dates, were deposited in the receptacle made for the purpose, and the foundation-stone was then lowered inio its place, and declared well and truly laid by Mrs Begg. 

The building is of the Scotch Baronial style, with battlemented gables and turreted angles. The wall and nearly all the partitions will be built of stone similar in composition to the famous Kakanui stone, but much harder, and of a warmer colour. There are quarries of it in the neighbourhood, and in dose proximity to the building. 

It is proposed to cover the roof with Otepopo slates, if the enterprising proprietors will turn out a good, evenly split sample. The principal entrance is from a spacious portico of segmental form, with columns and arches springing from the angles of two large bay windows, which are on each side. The hall measures 20ft. x 17ft., at the farther end of which, and separated from it by an archway, with columns on either aide, is the staircase, 7ft. x 14ft. Opening from these are the drawingroom and library, each 20ft. x 25ft, with two large bays in each; and the dining-room and principal bed-room, with dressing-room, bath room, and office, en suite, to which there is a porch and side entrance.

Adjoining the dining-room is a servingroom, 12ft. x 9ft., communicating with a passage to the kitchen. 

Behind the principal staircase is a strong room, and a servant's staircase communicates with the passage already mentioned. The kitchen is 22ft. x 17ft, with large laundry, scullery, and offices in connection, to be fitted with all the appointments necessary for comfort and convenience.

At the head of the principal stairs is a large, open landing, surmounted by a large, square lantern light, towering above the roof. The inside under the light is splayed and panelled, and well decorated with enriched cornices, all of plaster work. From the landing, seven large, airy, well lighted and ventilated bedrooms (with fire-places to each) are entered; four of them have dressing-rooms, with bath-rooms and other conveniences, and lots of presses for linen, &c. There is also a passage leading to the servants' bedrooms, of which there are three, averaging 15ft. x 11ft., with fire-places to each.

There is to be a large underground concrete cistern for storing the roof water, connected with which there will be a force-pump to raise the water for supplying the baths, kitchen, range, &c. The building appears to be well adapted to the site, which is an elevated plateau on the west bank of the Otekaike river, about three miles from its confluence with the great Waitaki river, and commands an extensive view of the plains through which those rivers run, and of the surrounding country. The grounds have been tastefully laid out and planted with a variety of evergreens and deciduous trees, which imports an appearance of age and settledness to the place, scarcely expected to be met with so far in the interior of the country. The architects are Messrs Mason and Wales, of this city.  -Otago Daily Times, 8/5/1876.

The Bruce Herald regrets to observe that the Hon. Robert Campbell, Chairman of the Waitaki County Council, has accepted a salary of £l50 per annum for his services in that capacity, considering that Mr Campbell is probably the wealthiest gentleman in this colony, without exception — owning as he does half a million of sheep.   -Cromwell Argus, 29/5/1877.

BRIDGE FOR THE UPPER WAITAKI. 

The Hon. Robert Campbell, Messrs S. E. Shrimski, M.H.R., Wm. Moody (Kakanui), James Bruce (Chairman of Waimate Council), and J. B. McGregor, C E., yesterday afternoon waited upon the Hon. Mr Macandrew and the Hon. Mr Larnach, for the purpose of ascertaining what assistance the Government would give towards the erection of a bridge across the Upper Waitaki. They refered at considerable length to the importance of the work, and estimated the cost of the bridge at L10,000 or L12,000. They expressed the opinion that the Government should contribute one-half of the funds. 

The Hon. Mr Larnach: The difficulty I see is in the matter of funds, as there is no vote on the Estimates for the work, I hardly see how it can be done. 

The Hon. Mr Campbell said that if the Government were favorable to the project the House would at once vote the money. The Councils would contribute their sums, and would commence the work. 

The Hon. Mr Larnach said that he would he disposed to recommend that the Government should help to the extent of one-third, whatever the cost might be. The Committies could then join together and contribute the other two-thirds. 

Mr Bruce remarked that if the financial arrangements had been formed with the intention of leaving the County which he represented out in the cold, it could not have accomplished the result more effectively. Their Council was in an impecunious position, considering the works which had to be carried out. 

After some further discussion, the deputation agreed that its members should urge upon the Councils which they represented to contribute the two-thirds asked for by Mr Larnach. 

The Hon. Mr Macandrew thought the proposal a fair one, and the Hon. Mr Larnach promised to submit it to the House next year.  -North Otago Times, 5/1/1878.

DUNTROON.

(FROM OUR OWN CORRESPONDENT.) 

Saturday last was a gala day for the school children of Duntroon. A two-horse conveyance from Otekaike, and Mr Goddard's coach and six greys from the township, gaily decorated, carried off 27 boys and girls, amid shouts of glee, to visit the grounds and mansion of the Hon. Robert Campbell. Nothing could possibly be kinder than the manner in which that gentleman and his lady received such unusual and lively visitors. Mr and Mrs Campbell and friends romped, played, and feasted with them all, sparing no pains to make the youngsters happy, and the success was perfect. The amount of good things of every conceivable kind, stowed out of sight at lnncheon, was simply marvellous, but under such strong temptation, pardonable. During the afternoon about a barrowload of lollies, nuts, and almonds was scattered by Mr Campbell on the lawn, and to ward off the time of departure a clothes basketfull of suitable presents and toys was distributed by Mrs Campbell around the children. All were more than satisfied and suitably acknowledged their obligations. The visit to Otekaike will be a green spot on the memories of the school children of Duntroon for many a long year to come. At 0 o'clock the coaches were remounte, and amid vociforous cheers to their kind and generous host and hostess, the noisy troop startod homewards. I must add that the services of Mr Goddard were offered spontaneously, immediately on his hearing of the projected visit. The act bespeaks itself.   -North Otago Times, 4/2/1880.

Mr. Edward A. Gifford has just completed a beautifully executed painting'in water colors of Otekaike, the delightful seat of the Hon. Robert Campbell. It differs from the former picture painted by the same artist, inasmuch as the house and surrounding grounds are, in this instance, brought out more prominently. Naturally, to secure this point, the general landscape has had to be curtailed; but, not withstanding this disadvantage, the picture proclaims itself to be one of more than usual merit. The two together make a most pleasing and attractive pair. Mr. Mollison has been kind enough to afford space in his window in Waitaki Buildings for the exhibition of the picture prior to its removal to Otekaike, and anyone will be repaid for the trouble of taking a peep at his window any time during the next day or two.   -Oamaru Mail, 23/3/1880.

To the Mining Registrar at Naseby, of the Naseby Mining District, and all other persons whom it may concern.

TAKE NOTICE, that it is intended to construct a Water-race and divert water for driving machinery, irrigation, and other industrial purposes, from the Otekaike River, commencing at a point about one mile above the homestead of the Honorable Robert Campbell, at Otekaike, and terminating at the said homestead. The length of the said water-race is about one (1) mile; mean breadth six feet, and depth one foot; to divert 20 heads of water, and to be completed within three months from date of application. I also apply for a right to deposit silt, sludge, and debris, on a piece of land seven feet wide on both sides of the said water-race throughout its entire length. 

Dated this 10th day of April, 1880. ROBERT CAMPBELL. 

By his Solicitor G. F. ROWLATT.

All objections to the above application must be lodged in writing at the Mining Registrar's Office, at Naseby, within thirty days from the date hereof. 

Hearing at Office of Mining Registrar, Court house, Naseby, on Tuesday, 25th May, 1880. at 11 am. THOMAS L. SHEPHERD, Mining Registrar.  -North Otago Times, 26/4/1880.

From a telegram received, the North Otago Times learns that the prospectus has been issued in London, of a company called "Robert Campbell and Sons (Limited)," with a capital of £600,000. The object is to purchase land and further develop sheep farming in New Zealand. The Hon. Robert Campbell, of Otekaike, is one of the promotors of the contemplated company.   -West Coast Times, 10/8/1881.

About 600 of the Oamaru folk made an excursion by rail to Otekaike on Friday, and were most hospitably entertained by the Hon. Robert Campbell, who practically kept open house for them, besides engaging the Oamaru Garrison Band to play during the day.   -Evening Star, 15/2/1886.

It is really too bad that Mr Robert Campbell of Otekaike should cause so much pain to so many people, ourselves amongst them. It is some time now since the lieges of Christian England gave up looking upon kings as "the Lord's anointed" — as persons who ould do no wrong either in their public or private capacities. But what we have ceased to allow to our kings we still allow very devoutly to our men of property. When the lord of many thousands of fair acres, the master of numerous bleating flocks and lowing heads — and Mr Campbell of Otekaike is such an one, we believe — deigns to dilate on any subject he instantly becomes with every properly trained Englishman a veritable Sir Oracle; 

And when he opens his mouth let no dog bark. 

In other words, a man of property can talk no nonsense, can do no wrong — that is, amongst properly educated Britons; though it becomes quite otherwise should he and his property happen to part company. Then he will have to be very wise and righteous indeed to pass a moment's muster with the worshippers of the great god Mammon, whose followers comprise probably not less than 99 per cent of our Christian populations. 

Well, Mr Campbell of Otekaike is a man of large estate, and everything he says is therefore encircled more or less with a gospel halo. Consequently the letter which he has just written about the Oamaru Harbor Board's proposed loan of L30,000 must be exceedingly precious in the eyes of many estimable persons. And desiring as we do to keep in sympathetic touch with the bulk of our fellow mortals, we ourselves must of course, under the circumstances, regard Mr Campbell's letter with profound reverence as the emanation of an almost divine intelligence. And yet we will venture to say, that every right-minded English Christian in the community would treat the same letter pretty roughly were it the composition of some miserable hunks with little land and less bank credit. Indeed, its inherent balderdash would then be treated with a large amount of contemptuous silence or with numerous volleys of contumelious epithets. For, fairly boiled down, the whole letter just amounts to this. To save all its past expenditure from being practically thrown away, the Oamaru Harbor Board asks the ratepayers of its district to sanction a new loan of L30,000. This, at 6 per, cent, would mean for the whole district additional rating to the extent of L1800 a year — at 5 per cent, L1500. Yet in order that they may escape paying that, Mr Campbell advises the latepayers to vote against the loan, at the same time telling them in effect that in resolving to save that amount they will be placing themselves in a position to lose at least not less than L16,000 a year! This is the amount which it is estimated the Government would reap from the district in railway revenue were the harbor allowed to go to the dogs. Then, in addition to all that extra outlay, the district would of course have to go on paying annually the L2,000 odd which it now pays in interest on the existing Harbor Board loans. Thus, in order that they may not add to their liabilities by L1500 or L1800 a year, Mr Campbell askes tbe ratepayers of North Otago to go in for paying perpetually L28,000 per annum, for L12,000 of which they would receive absolutely no return, the balance of L16,000 being the amount they would now be paying yearly — for mere outward railage, we believe — were there no harbor at Oamaru.

Such is the gist of Mr Campbell's letter. It will be interesting to observe whether the ratepayers, carried away by the traditional reverence of all of us for tbe utterances of men of property — for "the divinity that doth hedge" a man of large estate — will allow themselves to be influenced by Mr Campbell's arguments, or whether they will treat the arguments in accordance with their intrinsic merit — with silent contempt or uproarious laughter. Possibly if all our settlers were, like Mr Campbell, engaged solely in the business of wool growing, they might be guided by his astounding logic, but, being grain growers, to follow him would be to follow a leader who practically asks them to perpetrate a fearful piece of financial suicide. Looked at from any point of view, however, Mr Campbell's arguments are certainly the funniest we have come across for a considerable time and as Mr Campbell, according to his own confession, has, on the subject of Oamaru's monetary matters, been endeavoring to enlighten London financiers through the medium of leading articles from the North Otago Times, we think he cannot do more to enlighten them as to his own status as an authority on finance, than by sending them his own fearful and wonderful epistle of the 1st instant, accompanied by this little article as a simple commentary on its delectable contents.  -North Otago Times, 8/11/1886.

The employees of the Hon. Robert Campbell at Otekaike station will give a concert and ball at the station on the evening of Friday first in aid of the funds of the Oamaru and Waimate Hospitals. The fact that the concert has been arranged for shows that the men are not unmindful of the advantages of having such an institution in the place. To many men working in the country who have no friends here and no house in town in which they can reside for medical attendance, the Hospital must prove an invaluable institution, and the getting up of the concert is a graceful acknowledgment of the fact. We hope the concert and ball will be largely attended, as they deserve to be.  -North Otago Times, 19/1/1887.

SCHOOL PICNICS.

(from our own correspondent.) There should be many happy little heads on the pillows of the children in the Duntroon, Maerewhenua, and Otiake districts this night, if ever child can be made happy by kind and generous entertainment, and gifts of costly and beautiful toys. The school children of the above-named districts were invited by Mrs Campbell, of Otekaike, to a picnic to be held on the grounds of that place on Thursday afternoon. Every available conveyance was accordingly secured. The Hon. Robert Campbell sent an express to Duntroon, and a four-horse drag to Otiake to convey the children, who, with their teachers and a few friends, began, to arrive at Otekaike at about 2 p.m., where all were most cordially welcomed by their kind entertainers, and started at once to enjoy the games and amusements provided for them. Boating on the lake was the rage for a time, and most of those present were taken for a ride on the water. But soon Aunt Sally claimed attention, all those who were lucky enough to succeed in breaking her pipe receiving a bag of lollies and other presents. Races for boys and girls were going on when the sound of the gong was heard, and soon all were seated at the tables spread on the lawn, and giving a good account of the tea, sandwiches, cakes, fruit, etc., provided. After this important part of the programme had received due attention, games of various kinds were again started. Presently a donkey appeared on the scene, gaily caparisoned, and bearing panniers filled with dolls of all sizes, sexes, and complexions — big dolls for the big girls, and little dolls for the little girls. Immediately Arabi (the donkey) became the centre of attraction, and was followed by an admiring crowd of youngsters to a stall which was now uncovered, displaying to longing eyes such a collection of toys and presents as Santa Claus himself might well feel proud of. Every child on the ground was presented with some toy or useful fancy article, Mrs Campbell managing to give to each just what he or she most desired. Being relieved of his load of dolls, Arabi, with two of his sons, was turned over to the boys, who kept them fully employed carrying about the grounds as many as could find seats on their backs at a time. After a few more games, scrambling for lollies, etc., all gathered on the terrace in front of the house, when the children sang some of their school songs. Hearty cheers were given for Mrs Campbell and the Hon. Robert Campbell. The traps were brought up amidst the squeaking of dolls, blowing of trumpets, cracking of whips, and the cheers and merry laughter of the youngsters, all — old and young — agreeing that they had spent the most enjoyable day of the holidays.  -Oamaru Mail, 10/1/1888.

TRIAL OF THE WOLSELEY SHEARING MACHINE.

At the invitation of the Hon. Robert Campbell, about 100 persons assembled at Otekaike yesterday to witness the test of the patent shearing appliance which has recently created such interest amongst pastoralists. Mr Williams, the agent for New Zealand, secured a special train from Oamaru for the benefit of those who desired to be present, and though the number who took advantage of this wise provision was not large, yet they comprised a very fair proportion of practical men whe were in one way or another more or less concerned in the issue of the trial. 

THE INVENTOR. For whatever advantages may accrue from the invention, the world is indebted to Mr F. T. Wolseley — a brother of England's "only general" — who, a pastoralist himself and owner of the Eureca Station, N.S.W., is also evidently an inventive genius, and naturally devoted his talents to the improvement of the appliances connected with his own industry. Mr Wolseley is, however, no longer a pastoralist. Having sold his patent in Great Britain for the sum of L20,000, and having scored such a remarkable success in the Australasian colonies, he is able to retire on his income. This is a result that is richly deserved, for he devoted many years and much money in order to bring his invention to its present stage of efficiency. 

THE MACHINERY. The machinery is simplicity itself. The shears resemble the appliance recently introduced to cut the hair of human beings and horses — or, in other words, the implement is constructed on the same principle as the modern reaper, and is as much in advance of the old shears as a reaper and binder is in advance of the scythe. It is light and handy, and consists of a three-bladed knife, which, placed in contact with a comb, oscillates, and it is this reciprocating movement, produced by an ingenious eccentric enclosed in the implement, that effects the cutting. The points of the comb, however, are not sharp, and it can therefore be brought into the closest contact with the sheep without lacerating them. The tension of the cutter on the comb may be regulated with ease and rapidity by means of screws. The machine is set in motion by means of steam, water, or horse-power. Each machine, or shears, is fitted with a 2ft friction wheel, which works against a small horizontal wheel, and the operator can disconnect the motive power, or vice versa, by touching a handy lever. The motion is imparted from the smaller wheel to the shears by means of a flexible catgut shaft, which is enclosed in a tube, also flexible. The shaft connects with spur and mitre wheels, hidden in the handle of the shears, the whole forming what may be termed a universal point, and thus the shears are set in motion. This arrangement, which is too complicated to understand with ease from any written description, enables the operator to turn the implement in any direction he thinks proper without impairing its efficiency. The machines are connected by a shaft with the motive power, and it is stated that they offer so little resistance that a two-horse power is able to work twenty machines. 

THE MERITS OF THE INTENTION. It is claimed for the machine that, by reason of the closeness with which it cuts the fleece, several ounces more wool will be realised than under the old method; that, there being virtually no second cuts and the fleece being even, the wool will be more valuable to the extent, say, of from 1/2d to 1d per lb; that the sheep will not be cut, and that, therefore, there will not be any losses by death in consequence, and the pelts will be of greater value. It is held that the result of these and other minor advantages would be sufficient to pay the total cost of fitting up a large shed in the first year. It does not appear that shearing can be done more expeditiously by the machine than by the old method, or that shearers can be dispensed with without disadvantage. Shearers will still be in requisition, and adepts with the old shears will also excel with the new. It is estimated that about 80 sheep can be shorn in a day, and that is not far from the average number turned out under the old method. But, as to whether or not the close shearing will be of much or any advantage is questioned by some. It is held that, if the fleece be shorn close the next fleece will be shorter by the extra amount taken off, and that, therefore, the extra weight would only be realised the first year. That is a question that has yet to be decided by actual experiment, though, we believe that the fleece would not be diminished at the end of the year by the closeness of the cut. It is also held in the same quarter that close shearing might not be possible in our colder localities, as the sheep would suffer from having little or no covering. But against this argument there is the fact that sheep are scarcely better off in this respect after being subjected to the old system, whereby the wool is left on unnecessarily thick in some places and cut to the skin in others. A sheep shorn in such a fashion would not be so well off for protection against the weather as a sheep whose stubble was even and in no place shorn off to the skin. The happy medium is what, we dare say, will have to be arrived at, and, as the shears can with ease be so adjusted as to leave on any length of stubble desired, there will be no difficulty in this respect. It seems probable that more wool can be taken off under the new than under the old plan without inconvenience or injury to the sheep, who may even be benefited by the change. 

YESTERDAY'S TRIAL. As to yesterday's trial, it appeared to give entire satisfaction to those who are immediately interested. A two-horse power steam engine supplied the motive power and the operators were experienced shearers. It was rather pleasant, and even fascinating, to watch the instrument creeping smoothly through the fleece and peeling it off with the utmost cleanness and precision. One's sensations are sometimes anything but pleasant when, watching a shearer working with the old appliances. But, as to the time occupied: a crossbred ewe was disposed of in 4 minutes; another in 6 minutes; and a big merino wether in 7 minutes. At another place in the shed two shearers tried their hands with the ordinary appliances, with the object of seeing how much wool could be taken off by the Wolseley implement after they had done their work. The first man occupied 10 minutes in the operation, and the Wolseley shears; afterwards took off his sheep 9 1/4 ounces of wool; the second man, who is reputed to be one of the most experienced shearers in the district, occupied 8min 7sec, and though he and the bystanders remarked that there would not be much left for the Wolseley machine to take off, the result was 7 ounces.

THE COST OF THE MACHINERY. The present cost of the machinery complete, with the exception of the motive power, is Ll0 per shear; and though, if the new invention possesses anything like the commercial and humanitarian advantages that are claimed for it, it is not dear at the price, yet it is probable that, as they get into general use, machines will become cheaper. Numerous orders were received by Mr Williams yesterday, one pastoralist alone having ordered 100 machines. Next year will tell a tale, for already there are 4000 machines sold in Australia, and New Zealand bids fair to materially increase the record. 

HOW WILL IT AFFECT THE SHEARER? His position should be improved. He will have no paraphernalia to carry. He will still be in requisition in accordance with his aptitude and reliability. The only difference will be that he will have an implement to work with that will not be constantly requiring sharpening, and whose, manipulation will necessitate none of that exertion that is found to be so tiring and injurious to the wrist.  -Oamaru Mail, 9/2/1888.

PARLIAMENTARY.

(OUR OWN CORRESPONDENT.) 

Wellington, last night. 

GISBORNE HARBOR BILL. 

The Premier, in answer to Mr Graham, says that it is absolutely necessary the Gisborne Harbor Bill should pass this session. 

Sir George Grey wishes the Native policy Bills postponed until further information shall have been obtained concerning the "dealings" that are to be "validated." 

Objection is made to the validity of incomplete purchases of Native land, on the ground that existing leases will be disturbed. It is recommended that a schedule shall be attached to the Native Land Court Bill particularising each transaction. 

The Hon. Robert Campbell is attacked with hermorrhage of the liver, and is in a critical state. 

The Legislative Council gave a banquet to the Governor on Saturday night.  -Poverty Bay Herald, 2/9/1889.

WELLINGTON NOTES

INVALIDS.
Dr Fitchett’s friends will be glad to hear he is well enough to sit up in a chair. Another invalid, the Hon Robert Campbell, is so far on the road to recovery that he took advantage of the fine weather today to drive in an open carriage.   -Lyttelton Times, 10/9/1889.

DEATH OF THE HON. MR. CAMPBELL, M.L.C.

Great regret will be felt at the anouncament of the death last night of the Hon. Robert Campbell, M.L.C. Mr Campbell had been in indifferent health for some considerable time, and during his presence in Parliament last session suffered from severe illness. The Hon. Mr Campbell was the son of the late Robert Campbell, of Buscot Park, Berkshire. Mr Robert Campbell, sen., made a big fortune in New South Wales in connection with the earliest discoveries of gold in that colony. The family is well known in Sydney, and one of the largest wharves is called the Campbell Wharf. The Hon. Mr Campbell came out to this colony some twenty years ago and purchased on behalf of his father the Benmore station in the Waitaki district. He shortly afterwards married a daughter of the late Mr Howden, of Christchurch. He had been connected with New Zealand politics almost ever since his arrival in the country. He was returned to the House as member for Waitaki during Sir William Vogel's first Administration, and was at that time a political supporter of that gentleman. In 1870 he was called to the Upper House, of which he has ever since remained a member. The late Mr Campbell seldom spoke in Parliament, and his influence was unobtrusive; but he has always been considered one of its most influential members. His residence was at Otekaike, in the upper part of the Waitaki County, where his house formed a prominent feature in the landscape and the hospitality of the district. The late Mr Campbell was related by marriage to Mr Humphreys, member for Christchurch North, and also to Baron Reuter, of cablegraphic fame. He was a supporter of the "turf," and will be remembered as the owner of Sir Modred in his Dunedin Cup year. The funeral takes place to-morrow.  -Evening Star, 10/12/1889.

FUNERAL NOTICE. 

THE Funeral of the late Hon. Robert Campbell will leave Lees street, Dunedin, for the Northern Cemetery, Tomorrow (Wednesday), at 3.30 p.m. 

HUGH GOURLEY, Undertaker.   -Evening Post, 10/12/1889.

FUNERAL NOTICE. 

THE Funeral of the late Mrs Robert Campbell, late of Otekaike, will leave the Criterion Hotel, Moray place, for the Northern Cemetery, on SATURDAY, the 19th inst., at 3 p.m. 

HUGH GOURLEY, Undertaker, Clarke and Maclaggan streets.  -Evening Star, 17/4/1890.

We take the following from yesterday's Otago Daily Times: — The funeral of the late Mrs Robert Campbell, who died at the Criterion Hotel on Thursday morning, took place on Saturday afternoon, and was largely attended. In the first carriage which followed the hearse was the deceased's two brothers Messrs A. J. Hawdon and C. G. Hawdon, and her sister. Mis C. W. Humphreys. In the second carriage were Mr Humphreys. M.H.R, Mrs A. Hawdon and Master K. Hawdon. Among other friends of the deceased present were — Mr Justice Williams, Mr J. Roberts, Dr Hocken, Messrs Haggitt, A. O. Begg, McKellar (Manager of Otekaike station), Mr C. W. Pogson (of Cottesbrook), Mr E. Menlove (Windsor Park), and James Smith (solicitor). Among other attendants at the funeral, were four old Otekaike servants, some of whom had been in the Hon. Mr Campbell's employ for no less than 12 years. The deceased's remains were interred in the same grave as those cf her husband in the Northern Cemetery, the funeral service being conducted by Bishop Nevill, A number of bequests were left by the deceased at her death. Among these was L5000 which was bequeathed to the Dunedin Hospital Trustees for the purpose of providing extra comforts for the patients of that institution. She also left for the specific purpose of erecting a church and parsonage in the Waitaki Valley, in some spot between Duntroon and Kurow. After the various bequests, the residuary legatees were Mrs K, W Humphreys and Mr C. G. Hawdon.  -Oamaru Mail, 22/4/1890.

The Late Mrs Campbell. — The Oamaru Mail learns that the immediate cause of the death of Mrs Robert Campbell was pleurisy and jaundice. The deceased lady had, however, suffered more or less for years, and there can be no question that the anxiety caused by the illness o£ her late husband and the shock occasioned by his death told very seriously on a constitution that was not at all strong. Mrs Campbell was remarkable for the gentleness of her disposition and the kindness of her heart, and as she was beloved by all with whom she came into contact, she will be greatly missed in the district, where she lived for so many years.  -Lyttelton Times, 22/4/1890.

ST. MARTIN'S CHURCH, DUNTROON.

A BEAUTIFUL SPECIMEN OF GOTHIC ARCHITECTURE.

It is probably within the knowledge of many of our readers that the late Mrs Robert Campbell, of Otekaike, bequeathed a sum of money to build a church, and parsonage for the benefit of the members of the Church of England resident in the Waitaki district. It is, however, not so generally known that this bequest was made at the special request of her late husband, the Hon. Robert Campbell, during his last illness. The parsonage, a handsome and commodious building, with a chapel attached to it, was erected near Kurow about nine years ago, during the incumbency of the Rev. H. C. Frere. Some two and a-half years ago it was generally agreed upon in the district that the time had arrived when the church should be built. Therefore the Standing Committee of the diocese and the Diocesan Trust Board were approached on the subject. A considerable length of time was occupied in preliminaries and in discussions about and negotiations for the purchase of a site, which should at the same time fulfil the conditions of Mra Campbell's will and the requirements of the parishioners, and a piece of land on the Main Upper "Waitaki road, close to the town of Duntroon, which makes an admirable site, was purchased from the late Mr R. R. Orr. Plans were submitted to a meeting of parishioners in October, 1899, and the designs of Mr Thomas Cane, architect, of Christchurch, were chosen by the congregation, and subsequently approved by the Bishop of the Diocese. The style of the building is pure Gothic, of the early portion of the fourteenth century. It consists of nave, chancel, vestry, organ chamber, and tower. The windows all have traceried heads, and are glazed with pale green cathedral glass with white margins in lead quarries. The roof of the nave is of strong yet graceful design, and is open to the ridge, as, indeed, are all the roofs. The floors of the nave and chancel are laid with tiles, excepting underneath the seats, where they are of wood. There is seating accommodation in the nave for 85 adults, which will probably prove sufficient for many years to come. The font, as is usual in Anglican churches, is placed just inside the entrance, and is of very handsome design, standing upon a base of wrought bluestone. The chancel, approached from the nave by three bluestone steps through a truly magnificent arch, is well furnished with holy table, credence rails, stalls, lectern and prayer desk. The reredos above the holy table is the gift and workmanship of Mr Harre. The vestry is alongside the chancel, separated therefrom by an arched arcade and carved wood screen The organ chamber is as yet without an organ, which, however, it is hoped will be placed there within the next year. The tower is of three storeys, of which the lower forms the porch, with tiled floor; the second storey, to which access is gained by a spiral stone turret stair, is the ringing chamber, and the third is the belfry, with double towered windows on all four sides, in which is hung an excellent bell. The tower is finished with a battlemented parapet, with a richly crocketted pinnacle at each corner, the total height from the floor level to the apex of the pinnacles being 50ft. All corbels, capitals, summer stones, and bosses are beautifully carved.

Upon the whole it may be said that this church, though small, is the most beautiful specimen of pure Gothic architecture in the colony. When it is stated that, in addition to the general drawings, plan, elevations, sections, and the like, there are 40 additional drawings of details, it will be seen that nothing has been left to chance, but that thought and careful consideration has been given by Mr Cane to almost every stone and every piece of woodwork. The whole of the material and workmanship is of the highest class. The stone is from Perry's Totara quarries, Mr John Menzies, of Maheno, who, curiously enough also built the parsonage, is the contractor, and, though somewhat behind his time, has completed an excellent building; McAndrew Harre, of Christchurch, is clerk of voiles, and the carving is being executed by Mr Baird, of Hall street, South Dunedin. Mr and Mrs Campbell, of Otekaiki, have presented brass altar cross and desk, vases and candlesticks, and book markers; Mr A. Deacon, of Princes street, Dunedin (an old friend of the vicar's of 20 years' standing), gives a beautiful font ewer and porch lamp; the Bible, Prayer Book, and altar Service Book are purchased with money given in the offertory at the laying of the foundation stone, supplemented by private gifts; the altar frontal and superfrontal, most artistically worked by Miss Haggitt, are being provided out of funds raised in the district. The church is to be consecrated by Bishop Nevill on the 23th inst., and will be dedicated under the name of St. Martin's Church, Duntroon, that being the dedication of the church in the old town of Duntroon in Scotland.   -Otago Witness, 14/8/1901.

Hocken Library photo.